Haystack
How the 9 leading AI models rank Haystack in AI agent frameworks.
How each AI ranks it
average position · verbatim answers kept
DeepSeekread the answer9th
The "best" AI agent framework depends on what you're building: simple RAG, multi-agent orchestration, enterprise automation, or coding assistants. But these are the frameworks that are actually used in production and have the largest mindshare in 2025.
Here’s a practical breakdown:
1. LangChain + LangGraph (Most popular general-purpose)
- What it is: The most widely adopted agent ecosystem. LangGraph is the newer agent-orchestration layer built on LangChain.
- Why people use it: Huge community, tons of integrations, supports workflows/state machines rather than just “agents.”
- Best for: Custom agents, RAG pipelines, complex tool-use, production apps that need control and persistence.
- Watch out for: Steep learning curve and API churn. If you just want a quick agent, it can feel heavyweight.
2. CrewAI (Best for role-based multi-agent teams)
- What it is: A framework for defining “crews” of AI agents with specific roles, goals, and tools.
- Why people use it: Simple, human-readable abstraction. Makes multi-agent collaboration feel intuitive.
- Best for: Marketing, research, content generation, and any workflow where you want agents to “hand off” work to each other.
- Watch out for: Can be too high-level for complex state management or low-latency production systems.
3. AutoGen (now part of Microsoft’s Agent Framework) — Strong for conversational agents
- What it is: Microsoft’s open-source framework for multi-agent conversations and code generation.
- Why people use it: Very flexible, supports complex dialog between multiple agents, strong for problem-solving and coding tasks.
- Best for: Research prototypes, coding assistants, data analysis agents.
- Watch out for: More research-y feel; production tooling is less polished than LangGraph.
4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
- What it is: Enterprise-friendly orchestration framework from Microsoft, designed with C#/Python support.
- Why people use it: Native integration with Azure OpenAI, good for enterprises heavily invested in Microsoft stack.
- Best for: Enterprise bots, internal automation, and apps that need structured planning.
- Watch out for: Smaller ecosystem compared to LangChain, but very stable for.NET shops.
5. LlamaIndex (Best for RAG-heavy agents)
- What it is: A data framework built for connecting LLMs to private data (retrieval-augmented generation).
- Why people use it: Deep indexing/retrieval features are unmatched. Agents can query across many data sources.
- Best for: Knowledge assistants, document Q&A, data-augmented agents.
- Watch out for: Less focused on pure agent orchestration; you often combine it with LangGraph or CrewAI.
6. Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) — Rising star
- What it is: Google’s official framework for building agents on Gemini/Gemma models, with built-in support for tools and multi-agent configs.
- Why people use it: Native Gemini access, simple API, backed by Google Cloud integrations.
- Best for: Developers already using Vertex AI or Gemini APIs.
- Watch out for: Newer than LangChain, so community/plugin ecosystem is still growing.
7. OpenAI Agents SDK (Successor to the deprecated tools)
- What it is: OpenAI’s lightweight, production-focused SDK for building agents with the OpenAI API.
- Why people use it: Minimal boilerplate, explicit tool calling, built-in handoffs between agents.
- Best for: Simple, reliable agents that rely on GPT models.
- Watch out for: Locks you into OpenAI models (though you can use compatible APIs).
8. Claude Agent SDK (Best for Anthropic-ecosystem users)
- What it is: Anthropic’s agent toolkit for building with Claude, featuring computer-use and long-context tools.
- Why people use it: Strong for coding and web-automation tasks with Claude’s 200k context.
- Best for: AI assistants that need deep reasoning and tool use through Anthropic models.
9. Haystack (Best for production NLP pipelines)
- What it is: An older, battle-tested framework for building LLM pipelines and agents.
- Why people use it: Ideal if you need reliability, evaluation, and deployment stability rather than experimental flexibility.
- Best for: Enterprise search / QA systems.
10. Pydantic AI (Fast-growing favorite)
- What it is: A framework that uses Pydantic’s schema validation to force agents to return structured, type-safe outputs.
- Why people use it: Very clean Pythonic API, great for anyone who loves type safety and structured data.
- Best for: Agents that need reliable JSON outputs, financial/analytical use cases.
So what should you actually use?
| If you need… | Pick this |
|---|---|
| Most flexible, huge ecosystem | LangGraph |
| Multi-agent role playing | CrewAI |
| Enterprise Microsoft/Azure | Semantic Kernel |
| RAG + data-heavy agents | LlamaIndex |
| Google/Gemini | Google ADK |
| Simple OpenAI-assisted agents | OpenAI Agents SDK |
| Type-safe, structured outputs | Pydantic AI |
My default recommendation: Start with LangGraph or CrewAI. If you’re already in a cloud ecosystem (Azure, AWS, GCP), go with the framework that has first-party support there. For enterprise stability, Semantic Kernel or Haystack are the safest bets.
How this is measured
Haystack’s AI Recommendation Score (14/100) reflects how widely and often the 9 AI models recommend it for AI agent frameworks: share of voice, mention rate and how early the AI models name it. Cited sources are published as receipts, never as a score input. Every monthly refresh asks each AI model the same buyer question once, and the exact run count behind every edition is published in its JSON record. Placement is determined solely by AI recommendation data; it reflects what AI recommends and is not an endorsement by CiteHawk. Read the full methodology →
Others in AI agent frameworks

Is Haystack your brand? Claim it free.
Sign up with your company email. Approved claims unlock the verified mark, movement alerts and the embeddable certificate badge.
Rankings are computed from AI responses only · Positions are not for sale