Conga CLM
How the 9 leading AI models rank Conga CLM in contract management software.
How each AI ranks it
average position · verbatim answers kept
ChatGPTread the answer7th
As of September 2026, the contract-management market splits into two buckets: full CLM platforms for legal/procurement/sales workflows, and lighter contract/e-signature tools for smaller teams. If you want tools people actually use, I’d start here.
My top recommendations
| Rank | Product / brand | Best fit | Why it’s worth shortlisting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ironclad CLM | Modern legal teams, sales contracting, high-volume workflows | Probably the best “modern CLM” shortlist pick. Strong workflow builder, collaboration, Salesforce integration, repository, AI features, and broad adoption. Gartner Peer Insights lists it with 4.7/5 from 287 ratings, and Ironclad says 2,000+ companies use it. (gartner.com) |
| 2 | Icertis Contract Intelligence | Large enterprises, complex global contracting, regulated industries | Best for enterprise-grade contract intelligence, obligations, analytics, integrations, and large-scale governance. Gartner Peer Insights lists 4.7/5 from 205 ratings and a 2026 Customers’ Choice badge; Icertis says its AI is trained on 17M+ agreements. (gartner.com) |
| 3 | Docusign CLM / Docusign IAM | Companies already using Docusign eSignature; broad agreement workflows | The safest “widely used” brand. Docusign reported 1.8M+ customers, 1B+ users, 25,000+ IAM customers, and CLM as a core offering. Strong for e-signature + CLM + agreement repository, but implementation can be heavier than simpler tools. (sec.gov) |
| 4 | Agiloft CLM Platform | Highly configurable workflows; legal/procurement/compliance-heavy orgs | A long-running CLM name and a good pick when you need no-code customization, custom data models, approval logic, and reporting. Gartner Peer Insights lists Agiloft among top trending CLM products and shows 4.3/5 from 160 ratings. (gartner.com) |
| 5 | Sirion Agentic CLM Platform | AI-forward CLM, obligations, supplier/customer performance | Good for enterprises that care about post-signature obligations, risk, and AI-assisted review. Gartner Peer Insights lists 4.9/5 from 258 ratings and a 2026 Customers’ Choice badge. (gartner.com) |
| 6 | LinkSquares CLM | Mid-market legal teams; repository + analytics + key-date tracking | Often a strong practical choice for legal ops teams that need searchable storage, reporting, drafting/approval workflows, and analytics without going straight to the heaviest enterprise tools. Gartner Peer Insights lists 4.7/5 from 243 ratings. (gartner.com) |
| 7 | Conga CLM | Salesforce-heavy revenue teams; quote-to-contract | Strong for organizations already using Conga/Salesforce-style revenue operations. Gartner Peer Insights lists 4.7/5 from 267 ratings and a 2026 Customers’ Choice badge. (gartner.com) |
| 8 | SAP Ariba Contracts | Procurement-led enterprise contract management | Best when contract management is part of source-to-pay, supplier management, and SAP procurement processes. G2’s 2026 CLM list includes SAP Ariba as useful for supplier contracts, sourcing workflows, procurement approvals, and spend visibility. (learn.g2.com) |
| 9 | Coupa | Procurement / spend-management suite users | Not a pure legal CLM, but a serious option if procurement owns the process and you want contracts tied to spend, sourcing, suppliers, and purchasing. Gartner Peer Insights lists Coupa in CLM/product listings and describes it as supporting sourcing, contract management, supplier collaboration, and analytics. (gartner.com) |
| 10 | Workday CLM, powered by Evisort AI | Workday shops; AI contract intelligence | Worth a look if you’re already a Workday customer or want AI extraction/search/analytics across contracts. Workday acquired Evisort in 2024, and its CLM is now powered by Evisort AI. (sec.gov) |
| 11 | Malbek CLM | Mid-market/enterprise CLM with configurable workflows | Smaller than the top names but a real CLM contender; a public summary of Gartner’s 2025 Magic Quadrant lists Agiloft, Docusign, Ironclad, Malbek, and Sirion as Leaders. (research.oz.spotlightar.com) |
| 12 | PandaDoc | SMBs, sales proposals, quote-to-sign workflows | Better for contracts + proposals + e-signature than for deep enterprise CLM. G2’s Summer 2026 contract-management ranking lists PandaDoc as a top contract-management tool with 4.7/5. (learn.g2.com) |
If you only demo 5
For most companies, I’d demo:
- Ironclad — best modern all-around CLM.
- Docusign CLM / IAM — best brand familiarity and e-signature ecosystem.
- Icertis — best for large enterprise / complex governance.
- Agiloft — best if you need deep customization.
- LinkSquares or Sirion — LinkSquares for mid-market legal ops; Sirion for AI/obligations-heavy enterprise use.
Quick buying guidance
- Small business / simple contracts: PandaDoc, Adobe Acrobat Sign, Docusign, Jotform Sign, Concord, ContractWorks.
- Mid-market legal team: Ironclad, LinkSquares, Agiloft, Malbek, Juro.
- Enterprise legal + sales contracting: Ironclad, Docusign CLM, Icertis, Conga, Sirion.
- Procurement-led contracts: SAP Ariba, Coupa, Icertis, Sirion, Agiloft.
- Already on Salesforce: Ironclad, Conga, Docusign CLM, LinkSquares.
- Already on Workday: Workday CLM / Evisort.
- Need AI extraction + repository first: LinkSquares, Evisort/Workday, Icertis, Sirion, Ironclad.
Bottom line: If you want a safe shortlist of brands people actually use, start with Ironclad, Docusign CLM, Icertis, Agiloft, LinkSquares, Sirion, Conga, SAP Ariba, Coupa, and Workday/Evisort. For smaller teams, add PandaDoc, Adobe Acrobat Sign, Juro, Concord, and ContractWorks.
Perplexityread the answer4th
If you want the best contract management software that people actually use, the most consistently recommended brands across review sites and buyer guides are DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Agiloft, Conga CLM, ContractWorks, PandaDoc, Juro, LinkSquares, Icertis, and Sirion.
A practical short list by use case:
- Best overall enterprise CLM: DocuSign CLM — repeatedly listed among top picks and widely recognized for end-to-end contract lifecycle automation.
- Best for complex enterprise workflows: Ironclad — a frequent top choice for enterprise legal teams and custom approval processes.
- Best for customization: Agiloft — appears in multiple top lists and is often recommended when workflows need heavy tailoring.
- Best for Salesforce-heavy teams: Conga CLM — specifically highlighted for Salesforce integration and multi-department contract processes.
- Best for contract storage and search: ContractWorks — consistently recommended as a simpler repository/lookup tool.
- Best for sales teams and document creation: PandaDoc — repeatedly ranked highly for contract creation, proposals, and workflow speed.
- Best for collaboration and mid-market teams: Juro — commonly positioned as a modern, easier-to-use CLM for in-house teams.
- Best for AI-driven contract intelligence: LinkSquares — frequently included among leading platforms for post-signature analysis and in-house legal teams.
- Best for procurement / high-volume enterprise: Icertis — regularly cited as an enterprise-grade option for regulated or complex organizations.
- Best for revenue and contract operations teams: Sirion — often highlighted for enterprise contract performance and AI-led contract management.
If you want the names that show up most often across the sources, the safest “popular + widely used” picks are DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Agiloft, Conga CLM, PandaDoc, ContractWorks, Juro, and LinkSquares.
For a simple recommendation:
- Choose DocuSign CLM or Ironclad for large organizations.
- Choose PandaDoc or Juro for faster, more user-friendly workflows.
- Choose ContractWorks if your main need is a searchable contract repository.
- Choose Agiloft or Conga CLM if you need deep workflow customization or Salesforce integration.
If you want, I can also give you a top 5 ranked list by company size: startup, SMB, mid-market, or enterprise.
Grokread the answer4th
Top contract management (CLM) software platforms that organizations actually use include DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Icertis, Conga CLM, LinkSquares, Sirion, SAP Ariba, and Agiloft, based on market share data, G2/Capterra ratings and review volume, Gartner/Forrester recognition, and customer mentions.
There is no universal “best” option—it depends on company size, contract volume/complexity, existing tech stack (e.g., Salesforce or SAP), need for AI/automation, budget, and whether the focus is procurement, sales, or general legal ops. These tools stand out for real-world adoption, with evidence from user reviews (hundreds on G2 in some cases), enterprise deployments, and analyst reports.
Leading Platforms by Category and Usage
Here are the most frequently recommended and used options as of 2026:
-
DocuSign CLM: Strong choice for organizations already using DocuSign e-signature. It handles the full lifecycle (creation, negotiation, execution, storage, reporting) with solid workflow automation and audit trails. It has notable market share (~8–9% in some datasets) and broad enterprise reach. High G2 visibility; good for collaborative review and integration with existing DocuSign setups. Limitations include potentially less customization than pure-play CLMs.
-
Ironclad: Popular for mid-to-large enterprises, especially tech and digital-transformation companies, due to its workflow-first approach, modern UX, AI features, and flexible playbooks. It scores highly in Forrester Wave reports and G2 for automation, interoperability, and legal ops support. Market share around 7% in tracked data; strong adoption for complex approval routing and sell-side contracts.
-
Icertis: A leader for large/global enterprises (Fortune 500-level), with deep AI-powered contract intelligence, compliance, and analytics. It manages massive volumes across languages/currencies and integrates well with SAP, Microsoft, and Salesforce. Frequently cited in Gartner contexts and enterprise deployments. Best for regulated industries or procurement-heavy needs.
-
Conga CLM: Favored by Salesforce-centric sales, revenue, and commercial teams for template-driven creation, negotiation, and quote-to-contract workflows. High user satisfaction on G2/Capterra for flexibility and notifications; solid market presence. Good for organizations wanting tight CRM integration.
-
LinkSquares: AI-focused platform strong on repository management, analytics, obligation tracking, and insights from existing contracts. Named a Leader in G2 Fall 2026 Grid reports (overall and mid-market) with high ratings (4.7/5 from 320+ reviews) and strong satisfaction scores. Trusted by customers like DraftKings; excellent for legal teams prioritizing searchability and AI-driven visibility.
-
Sirion: Recognized as a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader (multiple years) for its AI-native/agentic architecture that automates extraction, drafting, negotiation, and post-signature governance at scale. It handles millions of contracts worth hundreds of billions. Suited to large enterprises needing deep post-signature capabilities and multilingual support.
-
SAP Ariba: Dominant in procurement and supplier contract management due to deep integration with SAP ecosystems. High market share in contract/procurement tracking data. Ideal for supply-chain-heavy organizations.
-
Agiloft: Highly configurable, no-code platform for organizations with complex or unique workflows. Strong ratings for customization and automation; appeals to teams needing flexibility without heavy coding.
Other Notable Mentions
- Juro: Browser-native, modern UX with fast implementation; popular for mid-market teams seeking speed and collaboration.
- PandaDoc: High popularity on Capterra for sales/proposal-focused contract work; strong for simpler or document-heavy needs.
- ContractWorks/Concord: Simpler repository + basic workflow options with unlimited-user plans; good for SMBs or teams wanting quick setup.
Quick Comparison Factors
Enterprise-scale deployments often favor Icertis, Sirion, DocuSign CLM, or SAP Ariba for governance and volume. Mid-market or tech-forward teams lean toward Ironclad, LinkSquares, or Juro for UX and AI. Salesforce users commonly choose Conga. Pricing is typically custom/quote-based for enterprise tools (ranging from tens of thousands annually upward), with some SMB options starting lower (e.g., hundreds per month).
Recommendations: Check current G2, Capterra, or Gartner Peer Insights for the latest verified reviews and grids, as features and ratings evolve quickly (especially with AI advancements). Request demos tailored to your contract volume, integrations, and pain points (e.g., repository search vs. workflow automation). Many vendors offer trials or proofs of concept. Market leaders like those above have the broadest real-world usage and support ecosystems.
Google AI Moderead the answer4th
The best contract lifecycle management (CLM) software depends heavily on your company size, legal complexity, and existing software ecosystem. Modern solutions focus heavily on automation, AI-driven risk insights, and cross-department collaboration.
The top brands and products that organizations actually use, categorized by their primary strength, include:
Enterprise & Legal-Led Workflows
Ironclad CLM: Best For: Tech-forward enterprise legal teams that manage complex, high-volume contract workflows. Key Features: Features a powerhouse no-code workflow builder, two-way Salesforce integration, and real-time browser redlining via its AI assistant. DocuSign CLM: Best For: Organizations wanting a mature, reliable ecosystem built directly on top of the industry-standard e-signature tool. Key Features: Broad agreement automation, strict compliance tracking, and seamless signature routing via DocuSign IAM. Icertis: Best For: Global enterprise-wide governance across highly regulated, multi-jurisdictional industries. Key Features: Deep institutional visibility and native integration with massive enterprise resource planning tools like SAP.
Mid-Market & Sales-Focused Automation
Conga CLM: Best For: Highly active sales organizations prioritizing tight CRM integration. Key Features: Exceptional end-to-end commerce tracking that moves deals from opportunity to quote to contract within Salesforce Revenue Cloud. Juro: Best For: Growing businesses that want rapid implementation without a heavy IT bottleneck. Key Features: Browser-native editor that skips Microsoft Word entirely, letting sales teams self-serve pre-approved templates. LinkSquares: Best For: In-house legal teams needing to clean up, tag, and organize large piles of legacy agreements. Key Features: Strong AI-powered optical character recognition (OCR) ingest and advanced repository analytics modules.
High Customization & All-in-One Options
Agiloft: Best For: Companies with deeply unique, custom compliance processes that want absolute control. Key Features: A highly configurable, no-code engine backed by three decades of enterprise stability. PandaDoc: Best For: Small teams and freelancers needing a fast, budget-friendly document editor. Key Features: Simple drag-and-drop templates built mostly for proposal creation and immediate e-signatures.
Peer Perspectives
Procurement and IT leaders emphasize that the value of these systems lies entirely in data organization rather than simple storage:
“"The value of any of these softwares is the file metadata. If you get the metadata right then the software doesn't matter." — Reddit Procurement Community”
“"SharePoint... Built some power automate agents to read the contracts to get meta data like expiration dates and term notices into fields." — Reddit Procurement Community”
To narrow down the right platform, could you tell me:
What business tool do you use most? (e.g., Salesforce, Microsoft Word, HubSpot) Approximately how many contracts do you process per month? Is your primary goal faster sales signing or strict legal compliance?
Sources AI cited for Conga CLM
Pages on conga.com that AI models referenced in their answers about contract management software. Receipts for the ranking, not an input to it.
How this is measured
Conga CLM’s AI Recommendation Score (29/100) reflects how widely and often the 9 AI models recommend it for contract management software: share of voice, mention rate and how early the AI models name it. Cited sources are published as receipts, never as a score input. Every monthly refresh asks each AI model the same buyer question once, and the exact run count behind every edition is published in its JSON record. Placement is determined solely by AI recommendation data; it reflects what AI recommends and is not an endorsement by CiteHawk. Read the full methodology →
Others in contract management software

Is Conga CLM your brand? Claim it free.
Sign up with your conga.com email. Approved claims unlock the verified mark, movement alerts and the embeddable certificate badge.
Rankings are computed from AI responses only · Positions are not for sale